Orlando Science Centerinc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
590896343
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Orlando, FL, USA
Phone
4075142261
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Science and Technology Museums

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$19,938,677
Expenses
$17,824,749
Assets
$38,974,922
Liabilities
$3,710,966

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

44 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DEMETRIA SLOAN (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT &)
  • JOANN NEWMAN (PRESIDENT & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • JOANN NEWMAN (PRESIDENT & CEO): $297,904 total reported compensation
  • SCOTT BERNER (VP OF FINANCE & CFO): $158,052 total reported compensation
  • LESLIE WARHURST (CHIEF PEOPLE OFFICER): $134,684 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Orlando science center's mission is to "inspire science learning for life".

What it reported doing in 2024

161,000 of our visitors experienced osc through field trips and other educational programming. We inspire stem learning through on-site demonstrations, programs, labs and school field trip activities, teacher professional development, break camps and classes, an onsite preschool, and engaging competitions. Our educational programming is engaging, hands-on, and aligned to educational standards to ensure meaningful learning experiences. Off-site programs bring classroom and assembly-style learning to students and their families at local schools, libraries, and other educational and other cultural venues in nine counties throughout central Florida.osc's place-based outreach program, neighborhood science, provides consistent stem learning experiences for after school programs identified by our community partners and local government officials as distressed communities that lack access to quality stem experiences. On fiscal year (fy) 2024 neighborhood science served two locations, grand avenue neighborhood center and the bradley otis branch of the boys & girls clubs of central Florida, with free stem workshops 2-4 days per week, covering topics such as engineering design process, computer science, coding, robotics, virtual reality, and maker spaces. We have multi-year commitments at each of these locations, enabling us to make a deep, lasting impact through long-term, consistent programming. These partners are located in the 32805 zip code, which the economic innovation group identified as a distressed zip codes, enduring a low rate of high school graduation, high unemployment rate, and high poverty rate. In fiscal year 2025, neighborhood science provided over 5,000 student touchpoints.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 68
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 77.8%; rating input score 78
  • Program expense ratio: 86.4%; rating input score 86
  • Fundraising efficiency: $11.18 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.6%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.19; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.3%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.6% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 77.8% of revenue deployed · 86.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 41 of 41 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $15.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $298K · 44 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.4M reported
  • Consistency: 37 of 37 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 41/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.