Organic Soup Kitchen

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
271081432
IRS 990 coverage
2016–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2015, Form 990-N 2011
Location
Santa Barbara, CA, USA
Phone
8053642790
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Soup Kitchens

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,973,591
Expenses
$1,732,721
Assets
$1,147,981
Liabilities
$202,262

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANTHONY CARROCCIO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • ANDREA SLABY-CARROCCIO (COO/TREASURER): $283,812 total reported compensation
  • ANTHONY CARROCCIO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $283,812 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to provide metabolic oncology nutrition to support the health of seniors, cancer patients and chronically ill individuals.

What it reported doing in 2025

Organic soup kitchen program description basic needs food security soupmeal delivery program: organic soup kitchen's flagship program provides nutrient-dense soupmeals to food-insecure individuals throughout santa barbara county. This essential service addresses the basic need for reliable, healthy nutrition among low-income seniors, and individuals facing chronic illness, each soupmeal is handcrafted using locally sourced, organic ingredients and is delivered weekly, ensuring clients receive consistent nourishment to support overall health and well-being. The program operates on a zero-waste model, incorporating food recovery practices to reduce environmental impact while feeding the community.medically tailored meals program: in partnership with healthcare providers including cencal health, organic soup kitchen's medically tailored meals program serves individuals diagnosed with cancer and other critical illnesses. Each soupmeal is designed by nutritionists and chefs to meet specific dietary needs based on a client's medical condition, treatment plan, and recovery goals. Meals are anti-inflammatory, immune-boosting, and easy to digestproviding therapeutic nourishment that supports healing and enhances quality of life. Clients also receive wellness support and nutrition education as part of a holistic care approach. This program not only improves health outcomes, but also reduces hospital readmissions and lowers healthcare costs.together, these programs form a critical safety net for the most vulnerable in our communityensuring that no one facing illness, poverty, or isolation is left hungry.return to vitality: education lecture series: this is organic soup kitchen's educational lecture series designed to empower low-income seniors and individuals living with cancer or chronic illness with practical, evidence-based nutrition and wellness knowledge. Grounded in osk's food-as-medicine approach, the series translates complex health information into accessible, actionable tools that participants can apply in their daily lives.led by registered dietitians, healthcare professionals, and wellness experts, each lecture explores topics such as anti-inflammatory nutrition, immune-supportive foods, managing symptoms through diet, hydration and digestion, and strategies for sustaining energy and vitality while living with serious illness. The series emphasizes whole-food, organic nutrition and complements osk's medically tailored soupmeal programs.return to vitality goes beyond information-sharingit fosters confidence, connection, and resilience. Participants engage in interactive discussions, ask questions specific to their health needs, and receive culturally appropriate resources that reinforce long-term food security and wellness. By pairing education with nourishment, organic soup kitchen helps clients not only survive, but move toward improved quality of life, independence, and renewed vitality.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 75%; rating input score 75
  • Program expense ratio: 88.1%; rating input score 88
  • Fundraising efficiency: $43.04 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 12.2%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.66; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 32.8%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 19.4% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 19.7% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 24.1% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 75% of revenue deployed · 88.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $284K · 7 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 28 of 29 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 27/100.