Organ Donation Research Consortium
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 352440175
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2015
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2015, Form 990-N 2013
- Location
- Vienna, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7035564242
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Organ and Tissue Banks
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $78,477
- Expenses
- $53,215
- Assets
- $134,519
- Liabilities
- $13,606
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JEFF ORLOWSKI (PRESIDENT)
- JENNIFER PRINZ (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
- ELIZABETH DAVIES (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JEFF ORLOWSKI (PRESIDENT)
- JENNIFER PRINZ (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
- ELIZABETH DAVIES (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To advance organ donation through scientific research in order to improve outcomes for donors, their families, recipients, and society as a whole.
What it reported doing in 2015
Provided educational forums to inform members of current grant research progress and discuss future research plans.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 62% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 57% for direct work, and 43% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Liabilities are high compared with assets and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 71
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 59.7%; rating input score 60
- Program expense ratio: 88.1%; rating input score 88
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 32.2%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.53; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 21.1% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.2% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 33.8% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 59.7% of revenue deployed · 88.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $47K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2014 to 2015
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.