Oregon Youth Soccer Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
911797053
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Beaverton, OR, USA
Phone
5036264625
Rating
63
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$70,000
Expenses
$62,992
Assets
$93,518
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SCOTT ENYART (PRESIDENT)
  • VICTORIA POUNDS (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • SCOTT ENYART (PRESIDENT)
  • VICTORIA POUNDS (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • ROBERTA CLOUTIER (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary mission of the foundation is to receive and manage funds in support of projects designated to promote the development of youth soccer throughout the state of Oregon, and in doing so, to support the purposes of the Oregon youth soccer association.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Oregon youth soccer foundation was formed as the fundraising arm of Oregon youth soccer in 1996 with the goal of providing member clubs with a source of funding for:- programs promoting equity and inclusion for all Oregon's youth, and continually strives to create opportunities for communities to grow and strengthen together through the game of soccer.- field development.- scholarship opportunities.- coaching education.- referee education.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 30
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 61
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 28.4%; rating input score 28
  • Program expense ratio: 31.5%; rating input score 32

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.48; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 25.5% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 20.9% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 22.6% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 28.4% of revenue deployed · 31.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $20K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 28/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 32/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.