Oregon Washington Health Network

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
825470606
IRS 990 coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Pendleton, OR, USA
Phone
5416634104
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Private Operating Foundations

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,238,659
Expenses
$3,220,726
Assets
$1,777,396
Liabilities
$1,565,069

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JENNA STENSRUD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • JENNA STENSRUD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $112,908 total reported compensation
  • LUIS IBARRA (DEPUTY DIRECTOR): $98,622 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Integrating physical, mental, behavioral, and public health services to improve health outcomes and health equity focusing on access, quality and cost effectiveness.

What it reported doing in 2024

Our services: copes outpatient provided compassionate, confidential, and professional services for people suffering from alcoholism and substance abuse. We believe that recoery from alcoholism and drug addiction is possible, even in very late stages. We prode ourselves in providing client centered treatment services and meeting people where they are at. The coopes peer centers located in pendleton, hermistion, and milton-freewater strive to offer barrier free, stigma free services to struggling individuals. Copes trained peer suppor specialists meet people where they are at to provide support and guidance in goal setting and action planning for each individual's pathway to recovery. At copes we believe in empowerment rhought shareed experiences. When you enter a copes peer center you will know you are not alone. The copes peer program is funded by the prime plus grant through the state of Oregon. Nurture Oregon's journey started with "project nurture" in multnomah county in 2015 to assist pregnant individuals facing substance use challenges. Because of successful outcomes, the Oregon health authority (oha) and comagine health expanded the program's reach, aiming for a wrap-around approach, including prenatal support, substance use treatment, and coordination of care with resources and services. Owhn was selected by oha and comagine to start nurture Oregon for pregnant individuals in easter Oregon and umatilla county.copes 4 youth is focused on providing behavioral health and substance use disorder services to youth across northeast Oregon and southeast Washington. This program is funded by a four-year health resources and services (hrsa) behavioral health care grant. Copes 4 youth is dedicated to providing safe and stigma-free services to our community's struggling youth. We provide these services through school-based education and our youth peer centers. Copes 4 youth aims to meet youth where they are at and walk with them every step of the way on their path to recovery. The ucope program aims to support the whole health and wellbeing of individuals who use substances. Ucope supports individuals acrosss the recovery continuum through increased access to preventive care, testing and treatment for hepatitis c ad HIV, harm reduction services, and immunization. Throught the ucope initiative we aim to provide cross-service collaboration as well as increaed availability to providers. Ucope is committed to providing low barrier access to treatment, and meeting clients where they are to provide quality care without judgment.the justice reinvestment equity program (jrep) includes 18 culturally specific and culturally responsive organizations in communities impaced by the Oregon criminal legal system. The Oregon Washington health network copes program has been selected to participate in this program due to our dedication to reducing incarceration and racial disparaties in the criminal legal system, promoting healing, and advancing community safety across eastern Oregon. The copes jrep program is focused on meeting these goals through the implementation of the batterers intervention program (bip), caring dads program and anger management program.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 89% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82.8%; rating input score 83
  • Program expense ratio: 83.3%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.6%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.55; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.88; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.6%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 21.7% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 22.3% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 82.8% of revenue deployed · 83.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 2 of 2 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $113K · 4 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $158K reported
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 44/100.