Oregon Tilth Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 943029559
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Corvallis, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5033780690
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $14,257,034
- Expenses
- $14,539,378
- Assets
- $14,726,399
- Liabilities
- $5,040,734
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANI KAME'ENUI (President)
- KIM GIBSON CLARK (Past President)
Highest reported compensation
- CONNIE KARR (CERTIFICATION DIR.): $328,822 total reported compensation
- LEONARD FREEMAN JR (MANAGING DIRECTOR): $195,931 total reported compensation
- CHRIS SCHREINER (Executive Dir.): $193,329 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Oregon tilth is a leading nonprofit certifier, educator and advocate for sustainable organic agriculture and products since 1974. The organizations mission to make the food system and agriculture biologically sound and socially equitable requires it to find practical ways to tackle big challenges. Oregon tilth advances its mission to build a brighter food future through strategic focus areas of engaged teams, empowered clients and exemplary leadership.
What it reported doing in 2024
Organic education program: through educational initiatives, the organization promotes food production practices that conserve natural resources, enhance resilience to climate change, and foster healthy, equitable communities. In 2024, Oregon tilth expanded its long-standing national partnership with the usda natural resources conservation service (nrcs) to grow from one to five joint staff positions that support technical and financial assistance for transitioning and organic farmers. By working within the nrcs to improve their support for these producers, the organization has a large ripple effect on programs that are providing billions of dollars annually to us agriculture.the organization serves as the pacific northwest regional lead for usdas transition to organic partnership program (topp). The program builds on existing collaborations and cultivates new partnerships with service providers, public agencies, research institutions, and industry leaders to expand knowledge and strengthen support for transitioning farmers and organic agriculture. Initiatives like farmer-to-farmer mentorship, individual technical assistance, educational field days, and accessible webinars are designed to grow the organic sector. Topp activities have expanded to include workforce training for new and existing agricultural professionals, including organic inspectors.in 2024, Oregon tilth embarked on a new project to increase awareness, understanding, and use of crop insurance and risk management tools by organic producers and those transitioning to organic. This initiative is focused on addressing the dramatic underutilization of vital farm safety net programs by organic producers.the organization is committed to diversifying its staff, leadership, and the broader organic sector. In 2024, partnerships with tribal organizations and groups serving latino and immigrant families invested in community events, outreach, storytelling, and direct support to remove barriers and bring resources to these historically underserved communities. A new partnership with paul quinn college, a dallas-based historically black college, provided students with real-world work experience in the organic sector while reducing their reliance on student loans.the organization works in strategic partnerships to shape public policy and government programs at the state and federal levels. In 2024, the organization collaborated with advocacy partners to engage legislators, agency leaders, and university administrators through written public comments, oral testimony, as well as online and in-person meetings. In these engagements we discussed organic research priorities, risk-based oversight of organic operations, and funding to support organic climate smart farming practices. By connecting policymakers and administrators with the organic community, the organization helps ensure the sectors values and needs are represented in decisions that advance organic research and education, expand markets, and promote organic practices that provide environmental, social, and economic benefits.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 51
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.2%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 86.6%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.01; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.34; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.9%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.2% of revenue deployed · 86.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $12.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $329K · 17 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.