Oregon Pro Arte Chamber Orchestras
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 800023023
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2016
- Location
- Wilsonville, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5035706211
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Symphony Orchestras
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $45,000
- Expenses
- $44,579
- Assets
- $16,041
- Liabilities
- $2,008
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PARK LLAFET (President)
People named in this filing
- PARK LLAFET (President)
- GALEN BRECKENRIDGE (Director)
- JEFFREY SPECHT (Musical Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide the community with musical performance
What it reported doing in 2016
Oregon Pro Arte Chamber Orchestra provided talented adult musicians a platform to share their musical gifts with the community through four concerts this past season. Other events: String members came alongside a high school orchestra to perform nosferatu and Hosted an emerging artist competition and awarded a prize as well as featuring the artist during a concert.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.3%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 90.2%; rating input score 90
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.9%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.36; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 43.7%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.1% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.3% of revenue deployed · 90.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $40K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2010 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.