Oregon Podiatric Medical Assn

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
936034202
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
St Paul, MN, USA
Phone
5036629920
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Business and Industry

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$87,828
Expenses
$124,267
Assets
$85,143

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CASSANDRA TOMCZAK DPM (PRESIDENT)
  • DR JOHNATHAN FRIEDMAN (PRESIDENT EL)

People named in this filing

  • CASSANDRA TOMCZAK DPM (PRESIDENT)
  • DR JOHNATHAN FRIEDMAN (PRESIDENT EL)
  • DR MICHAEL MCCOURT (PAST PRESIDE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The opma is a not-for-profit medical association committed to advocating foot health and related care for the people of the state of Oregon.

What it reported doing in 2025

The object of the opma is to bring into one organization the podiatric physicians of the state of Oregon, so that by meeting and by full and frank interchange of views, opma may achieve a greater quality of medical practice, raise the standards of education of those who would or are practicing podiatric medicine, secure the enactment of proper laws governing the practice of podiatric medicine, and unite with similar organizations in other states and territories of the united states of america to form the american podiatric medical association. Seminars: opma holds a minimum of two seminars each year for member and non-member podiatrists. These usually consist of one to three days of educational podiatry-related lectures and workshops. Prominent doctors from throughout the country speak on various topics relating to podiatry. Attendees receive cme credit for attending. Seminars further our exempt purpose by providing education to our members and other podiatrists with the intent that that makes them better practitioners. Meetings: meetings are held twice a year and members receive updates on the progress of various opma committees, legislation, and governmental affairs. Meetings further our exempt purpose by providing education to our members, updating them on what is happening with the organization and the profession, and give them a chance to meet socially and professionally. Resources for the public: opma maintains a website (www.opmatoday.com) which provides the public with information on common foot problems, diabetes and other issues. It also serves as a referral source for patients to podiatrists throughout the state. In addition, the website acts as an information source for members to receive information on upcoming events and publications which can assist them in their practice. Legislation: opma lobbies for legislation favorable to physicians and patients. In may 2013 Oregon house bill 2622 was successfully passed. This bill amends the definition of "physician" under Oregon law to include doctors of podiatric medicine. Our organization is supportive of the helpp act (hr1761 and s1318) which would recognize podiatrists as physicians under medicaid, clarify and improve coordination of care in medicare's therapeutic shoe program for patients with diabetes and strengthen medicaid program integrity. In 1999, opma passed legislation to clarify the scope of practice for podiatrists to include the ankle and allow qualified podiatrists to perform ankle surgery. The organization also successfully lobbied for a bill to reinstate podiatrists as attending physicians within Oregon's workers' compensation system and passed legislation to allow podiatrists to assist in any surgery on the body.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 24
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -41.5%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.69; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.3% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.