Oregon Outreach Clinic
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 931905011
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Eugene, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5417995683
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Mental Health, Crisis Intervention N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,320,667
- Expenses
- $1,121,634
- Assets
- $564,051
- Liabilities
- $27,746
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LISA SALDANA (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- MARK CAMPBELL (OPERATIONS D): $7,800 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Oregon outreach clinic has a mission of helping families realize health and stability by providing access to evidence-based behavioral health care. Our vision is to bring services to parents and families in their environments, breaking barriers to treatment access and increasing the potential for sustained outcomes. The Oregon outreach clinic will provide services to all eligible individuals insured with the Oregon health plan. Key treatment groups include parents and families living in lane or douglas counties who are involved with or at risk of involvement with the child welfare or self- sufficiency systems.
What it reported doing in 2025
Odhs funding: the odhs funds are part of a contract Oregon dhs established to support three clinics providing the just care program to families involved with child welfare. The just care model is an intensive outpatient mental health and substance use disorder program focused on supporting families. Our care coaches use evidence-based strategies to support parents with parenting, mental health, substance use and other life stressors. These odhs funds pay for components of the program that are not reimbursable through medicaid, such as mileage, group and individual supervision and emergency funds.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 88% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.3%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 99.3%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.1%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.5; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.7%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 128.8% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 84.9% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 46% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.3% of revenue deployed · 99.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 2 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $8K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.