Oregon Military Museum Project

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
810904009
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Clackamas, OR, USA
Phone
5037804735
Rating
55
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Museum, Museum Activities

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$107,238
Expenses
$8,557
Assets
$207,835

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Gary Clark (Vice President)
  • Dan O'Hollaren (President)

People named in this filing

  • Gary Clark (Vice President)
  • Dan O'Hollaren (President)
  • MARIE JENSEN (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The corporation, the Oregon Military Museum Project (OMMP), is organized to carry out the following activities and mission: (1) to complete the construction and exhibits, and prepare future operations of Oregon Military Museum (hereinafter the OMM); including with cooperation from the Oregon Military Department and private donors; and (2) to build and nurture essential relationships with business leaders, community leaders, companies, and corporations in the Pacific Northwest and the wider region to raise funds necessary to complete construction of the OMM. The secondary objective of OMMP is to formulate a long-term plan to sustain the OMMs future operations, in coordination with the Oregon Military Department and the OMM itself. The organization expects to accomplish this mission through the service of volunteers; solicitation, use and administering of gifts, grants, bequests, contributions, and devises for the foregoing purposes; and, engagement in any and all lawful activities incid

What it reported doing in 2024

(1) to complete the construction and exhibits, and prepare future operations of the Oregon Military Museum (hereinafter the OMM); including with cooperation from the Oregon Military Department and private donors; and (2) to build and nurture essential relationships with business leaders, community leaders, companies, and corporations in the Pacific Northwest and the wider region to raise funds necessary to complete construction of the OMM.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 86% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 21
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 83
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 4.1%; rating input score 4
  • Program expense ratio: 50%; rating input score 50

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 92%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 24.29; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -43.1% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -33.7% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -24.1% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 4.1% of revenue deployed · 50% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $4K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 4/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 50/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.