Oregon Mechanical Officials Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
943210247
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2015
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Milwaukie, OR, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$12,645
Expenses
$16,618
Assets
$89,325

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MIKE REMESNIK (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MIKE REMESNIK (PRESIDENT)
  • JOHN CORLISS (IST VICE PRE)
  • BILL HENDRIX (2ND VICE PRE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To establish standards in building codes, recommend and pro- mote uniform regulations and to advise and assist in admin- istration of mechanical laws and ordinances.

What it reported doing in 2015

To assist in the administration of mechanical laws and ordinances, omoa held its annual fall institute from september 15-16, 2015 to provide continuing education to code officials and associated building/mechanical professionals (architects, engineers & contractors). The 2015 fall institute consisted of 4 classes dealing with a variety of building and mechanical codes and laws. The number of attendees at the two day continuing education institute was 92.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 70% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -31.4%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.38; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.