Oregon Health Care Quality Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 931293103
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2017
- Forms available
- Form 990 2017
- Location
- Portland, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5032413571
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Health Systems
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,985,041
- Expenses
- $1,433,055
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHRISTENSEN MYLIA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- CHRISTENSEN MYLIA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $130,405 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Oregon health care quality corporation is dedicated to improving the quality and affordability of health care in Oregon by leading community collaborations and producing unbiased information. We work with the members of our community - including consumers, providers, employers, policymakers and health insurers - to improve the health of all oregonians.
What it reported doing in 2017
Who we are: the Oregon health care quality corporation is an independent, nonprofit organization dedicated to improving the quality and affordability of health care in Oregon by leading community collaborations and producing unbiased information. We work with the members of our community - including consumers, providers, employers, policymakers and health insurers - to improve the health of all oregonians.our vision:- q corp is a leader of results-oriented collaboratives where Oregon stakeholders come together to improve the quality and reduce the costs of health care in our state.- q corp collaborates with Oregon stakeholders to produce transparent data and analytics that are highly valued and actionable to improve the health outcomes of oregonians.- q corp is a trusted source of information that is routinely used in health care planning, programming, delivery, and evaluation.our work:(1) measurement and reporting.as an independent nonprofit organization, we bring stakeholders together to produce relevant and actionable information about the quality, utilization, and costs of health care in Oregon.(2) community convening.in our unique role as an independent, multi-stakeholder organization, we collaborate with stakeholders and experts around quality and cost issues, aligning efforts to address those issues and conceptualizing and informing programs using unbiased data and analytics.(3) patient centered primary care institute.the patient-centered primary care institute brings together technical experts, health care providers and staff, patient advisors, policymakers, academic centers and others to gather and share valuable knowledge and resources to help transform primary care.(4) public reporting: partner for quality care.our partner for quality care website has information that oregonians can use to help them get quality health care, including quality scores for doctors' offices and hospitals in Oregon. (5) community based initiatives.we work with community partners to coordinate and support activities that have the potential to positively impact the health outcomes of oregonians. For example, we are working with our partners on programs to improve maternity care in Oregon.our accomplishments:(1) bringing Oregon stakeholders together.we bring together the Oregon health care community to improve the quality and affordability of care across the state. Our board of directors includes senior representatives of state agencies, health plans, hospitals, and consumer, employer and medical groups. Our committees also include over 150 volunteers who bring their expertise and perspective to our work to improve health care in Oregon.(2) comprehensive measurement and reporting of primary care quality and resource use.we've developed the most comprehensive system for measuring and reporting primary care quality in our state. Oregon's largest health plans and medicaid fee-for-service participate by providing data to measure whether oregonians are receiving recommended health care services. We're also working to include cost of care information, to support efforts to improve the affordability of health care in Oregon.(3) engaging consumers in health care.our public reporting program, partner for quality care includes a nationally recognized, user-friendly website (partnerforqualitycare.org) with information to help oregonians make informed decisions about their care. In addition to tips for making the most of medical appointments and staying healthy, the website also contains ""quality scores"" for the care provided by Oregon's clinics and hospitals. National recognition: q corp's work is nationally recognized. In 2007, q corp became one of 16 organizations nationwide selected to participate in the robert wood johnson foundation's aligning forces for quality initiative. In recognition of its leadership to improve care in Oregon, in 2008 q corp was designated a chartered value exchange by the u.s. Department of health and human services agenc
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the required major-donor schedule is missing or incomplete.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 56.7%; rating input score 57
- Program expense ratio: 78.5%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: $62.42 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: No; rating input score 0
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 27.8%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.1%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -15.3% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -19.2% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 56.7% of revenue deployed · 78.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $130K · 18 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2011 to 2017
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Major donor itemization scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 39/100.