Oregon Coalition of Police and Sheriffs

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
472781802
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Portland, OR, USA
Phone
5032259760
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Community Coalitions

Reported finances

Revenue
$52,686
Expenses
$55,757
Assets
$125,816
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • AARON SCHMAUTZ (PRESIDENT)
  • RYAN HUMPHREY (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • AARON SCHMAUTZ (PRESIDENT)
  • RYAN HUMPHREY (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • JIM HABKIRK (TREASURER/SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Oregon coalition of police & sheriffs (orcops) is a non-partisan organization that advocates on behalf of over 2,000 police officers, deputy sheriffs and other individuals in Oregon law enforcement agencies. Orcops serves as a source of leadership within the law enforcement community and aims to build trust between law enforcement and the communities we serve. Orcops works on public policy issues that impact law enforcement officers in Oregon and also connects oregonians to the role law enforcement plays in keeping our communities safe.

What it reported doing in 2024

The purpose of this corporation is to engage exclusively in activities that promote the working conditions of law enforecment officers in the state of Oregon.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 51
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -5.8%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.26; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -4.8% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.