Oregon Christian Education Coalition
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 862320653
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Lebanon, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5412231524
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $34,400
- Expenses
- $27,403
- Assets
- $105,748
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
People named in this filing
- JANELLE DETWEILER (CHAIR)
- AL STEFAN (VICE CHAIR)
- SHERRI JAMES (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide legal, legislative, public advocacy to influence state and county policies that have an impact on christian schools. To protect the rights of christian schools to operate according to their mission. To inform christian schools of their legal, and legislative policies that seek to hinder their right to operate according to the mission of their school. To provide legal legislative advocacy to proect the rights of christian schools to choose the educational programs that best meet the educational and spirtual needs of their students. To work in collaboration with families, churches, educational institutions, and other leaders and organizations to promote the ability of christian schools to operate in line with their mission without restriction or reservation.
What it reported doing in 2025
Schools involved with the Oregon christian education coalition has grown to a total of eighteen. Six different legislative session efforts were complied in 2021 with outcomes ranging from unadvanced public hearings to successful amendments.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.7%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 20.3%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.86; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.2% per year; rating input score 0; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -10.6% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.3% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 79.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $27K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.