Oregon Chapter International Association of Arson Investigators

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
300419953
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2010, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Salem, OR, USA
Phone
5033780595
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$62,638
Expenses
$74,643
Assets
$123,014
Liabilities
$90

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RICH STENHOUSE (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • KEVIN SCHUMMER (DIRECTOR)
  • MARK SHAY (DIRECTOR)
  • JOSEPH FELAND (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To unite for mutual benefit those public officials and private persons engaged in the control of arson and kindred crimes. To provide for exchange of technical information and developments. To cooperate with other law enforcement agencies and associations to further fire prevention and surpression of crime. To encourage high professional standards of conduct among members and to continually strive to eliminate all factors which interfere with administration of justice.

What it reported doing in 2024

The organization provides necessary industry specific training to be expert witnesses and provide testimony as needed in criminal cases. The expert witness courtroom testimony program provides real courtroom experience with lawyers to take the stand for direct examination and cross examination. Oregon iaai held two classes with a 8 students in 2024. In september 2024, Oregon iaai held the 45th annual advanced arson training with 87 attendees offering 24 hours of tested continuing education. Both national and local instructors were part of this training, scholarships were provided through grants and sponsorship funds. Attendees are primarily from Oregon, but we often welcome attendees from other states.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 67% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -19.2%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.65; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.