Orca Network
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 912168027
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Freeland, WA, USA
- Phone
- 8666722638
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Wildlife Preservation, Protection
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,230,187
- Expenses
- $912,415
- Assets
- $1,441,990
- Liabilities
- $17,597
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- HOWARD GARRETT (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- SUSAN BERTA (EXECUTIVE DI): $69,127 total reported compensation
- HOWARD GARRETT (PRESIDENT): $12,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Public education about whales of the pacific northwest: their habitat, health, and safety needs. Data gathering and reporting to scientific researchers.
What it reported doing in 2024
Whale sighting network and orcasound listening project: the whale sighting network provided researchers, government agencies, and the public with detailed whale sighting reports gathered by staff, volunteers, and the general public. Through our continued involvement with the orcasound listening project we provide researchers, government agencies, and the public with the ability to monitor whales and ship traffic noise through hydrophones using the orcasound hydrophone system (including our own bush point hydrophone site) and collecting and sharing whale reports via an online app, social media, emails, phone/text, and website. Our sightings outreach increased to include 16,200 on our sightings network email list, over 275,900 on our two orca network wsn facebook social media pages, and 1372 on our whale sighting text alert list - 3,543 alerts sent out to share whalesightings to researchers, volunteers and community scientists in Washington state in 2024. Data from whale sightings collected by those watching from shore, assisted by the alerts they receive from orca network, provides trends in habitat use, population status, and the health of endangered orcas in the pacific nw. Orca network collected and shared over 17,663 whale reports in 2024, collected by staff and 2811 citizen scientists and volunteers. We have continued with a four-person sighting network staff, with one staff change, and now have one staff member with her masters degree and another just completing her doctorate. We continue participating in quiet sound's efforts to slow shipping traffic in puget sound to protect southern resident orcas, as well as with noaa fisheries, us navy nw region, and other agencies to assist with, track, and protect orcas and other whales in the salish sea.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 77% for direct work, and 23% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 67
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 71%; rating input score 71
- Program expense ratio: 86.7%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: $40.78 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 25.8%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.58; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.9%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 14.2% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 16.8% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 24.2% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 71% of revenue deployed · 86.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $791K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $69K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 40/100.