Orange Grove Isd Education Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
990928791
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Orange Grove, TX, USA
Rating
50
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$102,960
Expenses
$58,906
Assets
$79,204

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

24 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Kati Pesek (President)

People named in this filing

  • Kati Pesek (President)
  • Cheryl Walker (VP of Programs)
  • Mitchell Hippensteal (VP of Marketing)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We provide community donors and volunteers a pathway to promote excellence and innovation in teaching and learning for all students in Orange Grove I.S.D.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Education Foundation hosted its inaugural Recognizing Excellence in Education program to celebrate the accomplishments and dedication of Orange Grove ISD educators and staff. The event honored Teachers of the Year Staff Members of the Year recipients of lifetime educator awards employees reaching years-of-service milestones retirees and other outstanding contributors reaching state level goals. By recognizing excellence in education the program served Orange Grove ISD employees and the broader school community by strengthening morale fostering a culture of appreciation and reinforcing the Foundations commitment to supporting high-quality education. The Foundation successfully planned and hosted the event recognizing individuals across multiple award categories and helping build a stronger sense of community and commitment to attracting supporting and retaining exceptional educators for the benefit of Orange Grove ISD students.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 13
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 71
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 10.1%; rating input score 10
  • Program expense ratio: 17.6%; rating input score 18

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 42.8%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.34; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 10.1% of revenue deployed · 17.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $10K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 24 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 1 filing year from 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 10/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 18/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.