Orange County Sheriffs Advisory Council

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
953498487
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Santa Ana, CA, USA
Phone
7146796539
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Law Enforcement

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,376,353
Expenses
$1,005,369
Assets
$9,416,684
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

22 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • AARON WATTS (President)

Highest reported compensation

  • MARIBEL MARROQUIN-WALDRAM (Executive Dir.): $107,300 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Supporting the local law enforcement community by rendering vital assistance where government budgetary constraints limit funding.

What it reported doing in 2024

The council's current activities include the following: advisory council this fund is the general operating fund of thecouncil. It is used to account for all financial resources except thoserequired to be accounted for in another fund.project 999 assist the families of law enforcement officers who arekilled or seriously injured in the line of duty, in the county oforange, or postcertified law enforcement employed within the county oforange.erwood g. Edgar endowment this fund was established in 1992 to support equipment purchases for volunteer officers in the reserve division.life membership this fund was established during 1988 as analternative to council members paying annual dues. A onetime payment of$3,500 purchases a lifetime membership and various other councilbenefits. Contributions to this fund are used for investment purposes, with earnings on investments transferred into the unrestricted advisorycouncil fund.peace officers' memorial monument established to raise funds torebuild and relocate the monument to its present location at the tustintraining facility.star facility is a training facility that will allow academy recruits, deputies, and other law enforcement agencies to train in a safeenvironment while responding to active shooter scenarios.payroll deduction established to allow employees of the orange countysheriff's department to make direct contributions through payroll.these funds can be used at the discretion and vote of the advisorycouncil.k9 funds dedicated for the acquisition and training of k9 dogs for theorange county sheriff's department.drug use is life abuse (duila) duila was established in 1988 to assistthe sheriff's department in its education and awareness efforts on drugabuse.orange county sheriff's museum project funds donated to assist in thebuildout of a museum in the sheriff's building.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 93% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 53
  • Transparency & Controls: 83
  • Accountability: 94
  • Sustainability: 86
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 29.7%; rating input score 30
  • Program expense ratio: 80.4%; rating input score 80
  • Fundraising efficiency: $124.01 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 69.8%; rating input score 70; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 70.2%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.37; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10.7%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.7% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 29.7% of revenue deployed · 80.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 22 of 22 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $808K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $107K · 22 people listed
  • Consistency: 30 of 31 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 30/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 28/100.