Orange County 4-H Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 453357379
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Orlando, FL, USA
- Phone
- 4072549200
- Rating
- 45
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development - Agricultural
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $150,266
- Expenses
- $139,420
- Assets
- $153,229
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
People named in this filing
- Sara Hoefler (Chairperson)
- Elise Cronin-Hurley (Treasurer)
- Kevin Floyd (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
4H Youth Development
What it reported doing in 2024
The mission of 4-H is to provide meaningful opportunities for all youth and adults to work together to create sustainable community change. This is accomplished through civic engagement and leadership, healthy living, and science. A variety of positive youth development experiences are offered for Orange County 4-H youth. Programs described focus on STEM, Healthy Lifestyles and Citizenship/Leadership. Through participation, youth gain subject matter competencies as well as workforce readiness skills based on the Targeted Life Skills Model and National 4-H Council approved curriculum. Targeted life skills include effective communication, service learning, teamwork, record keeping and making positive choices by encouraging responsibility, critical thinking, problem solving, goal-setting and cooperation. Studies have found that youth who participate in 4-H are less likely to engage in at-risk behaviors (such as smoking, drinking, bullying, etc.), contribute more to their family and community, and state they are more likely to attend college (Lerner et al, 2012). Connell, Gambone and Smith (2000) cite that developing marketable skills for work and family life is an impact of positive youth development program such as 4-H. These skills assist youth transitioning to adulthood. Youth who have experience in leadership positions as youth are more likely to feel confident assuming those roles as adults. Orange County 4-H youth are preparing for careers in STEM through club work, camps and special events. Orange County youth are learning to make healthy lifestyle choices. Orange County 4-H after-school garden clubs, camps and project work are focused on encouraging healthy lifestyle choices for students to carry into adulthood. Training in Positive Youth Development (PYD) practices increases the number of 4-H volunteers effectively applying these research-proven methods. Providing youth with a safe and secure environment as evidenced by compliance with the UF/IFAS Youth Protection Policy allows for more active participation in quality 4-H experiences. This increased capacity by our Orange County 4-H volunteers increases the number experiences for our youth leading to the development of life skills, increased knowledge and leadership abilities. These qualities empower youth to positively influence their communities and become contributing members of society. There were 453 youth participating in Organized 4H Community Clubs. There were 251 youth participating in Special Interest or Short Term Programs. There were 148 youth participating in 4H Day Camp Programs. There were 7968 youth participating in School Enrichment Programs. There were 39 youth participating in After School Programs Using 4H Curricula.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 63% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 59
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.2%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.1; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -14.3% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.6% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -4.3% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.