Orange Audubon Society Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
596182031
IRS 990 coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
Maitland, FL, USA
Phone
4076986226
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$305,221
Expenses
$69,834
Assets
$2,142,694
Liabilities
$7,932

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DEBORAH GREEN (PRESIDENT)
  • JOHN JACK HORTON (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
  • ALAN SHAPIRO (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • RICK BAIRD (DIRECTOR)
  • DAVID BOTTOMLEY (DIRECTOR)
  • LINDA CARPENTER (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to conserve and restore natural ecosystems, focusing on birds and their habitats, for the benefit of humanity and the earth's biological diversity.

What it reported doing in 2024

Citizen science, conservation and nature education programs: in fiscal year 2024-25, orange audubon society, inc. (orange audubon) continued to serve its membership of 2,000 households and approximately 20,000 members of the public by offering educational classes, field trips, bird surveys, a birding festival and guest speaker presentations including online weekly 'bird chats with orange audubon.' central to communications with our community is a monthly 8-page, illustrated electronic newsletter announcing upcoming educational programs, providing conservation information and interesting birding articles, and that is opened by over 65% of recipients. Orange audubon also had an outreach presence at six local events. Hiring a half-time education coordinator in january 2022 enabled orange audubon to expand its reach, especially to elementary school students and their teachers, this year engaging and enthralling approximately 5,000 children and 1,000 adults (in-person) with bird-oriented programs. At title i schools with underserved populations, orange audubon's education coordinator has started three after school birding clubs, the first in 2022. With the lake apopka north shore restoration area being a primary conservation focus, the education coordinator is developing environmental education programs including stem curricula aligned with sunshine state standards suitable for elementary school children. To bring in college-age participants, orange audubon has participated in audubon Florida's conservation leadership initiative program (chapter leaders paired with college students as co-mentors) since the program's inception. Orange audubon's young birders club (for youth ages 8-17) has grown since its founding in 2021 and now has bimonthly field trips. Several former young birders who have aged out are now pursuing degrees in conservation and lead field trips. The following are additional mission-driven programs: 1) wildlife surveys and citizen science efforts: orange audubon and about 100 orange audubon volunteers conducted wildlife surveys on city, county and state public lands. Some of these surveys supported efforts by national audubon and the cornell lab of ornithology and others were specific to local parks and preserves, set up to provide bird population data to land managers. These included christmas bird counts; the 4th of july butterfly count; audubon Florida's eaglewatch and jay watch programs; cornell lab of ornithology's backyard bird count, feederwatch and nestwatch programs. Orange audubon promoted participation in a now international bioblitz using the inaturalist phone app, called the city nature challenge. Bird surveys had been carried out by orange audubon volunteers for many years, but a new series was started in 2019 with monthly surveys at wekiwa springs state park to document the increase in birds as a result of the park's prescribed burning program. Surveys expanded to include quarterly surveys at oakland nature preserve and rock springs run state reserve, and in this fiscal year, orange audubon initiated monthly surveys at the apopka birding park and on the lake apopka north shore. Data on wildlife populations provides critical information that enables land managers to make better-informed decisions, thereby enhancing the ability of birds and other wildlife to survive and thrive. Orange audubon's bird surveys welcome participation by all, create engagement and have brought about 100 volunteers into the orange audubon fold. Orange audubon participated in the ideal (inclusion, diversity, equity, access, and leadership) program, sponsored by the national science foundation and national audubon, which supported efforts to draw people of different ages and ethnicities, representative of local demographics, into community science activities. Binocular grants: the ideal program, an earlier diversity training program from national audubon and collaborative grants from national audubon allowed purchase of excellen

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 94% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 42
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 88
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 14.9%; rating input score 15
  • Program expense ratio: 76.4%; rating input score 76
  • Fundraising efficiency: $37.84 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 77.1%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 30.68; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 18.6% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4.6% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.8% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 14.9% of revenue deployed · 76.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $53K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 15/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 51/100.