Oquirrh Hills Performing Arts Alliance

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
205165880
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2021, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Magna, UT, USA
Rating
56
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Performing Arts Centers

Reported finances

Revenue
$160,477
Expenses
$123,330
Assets
$65,223
Liabilities
$1,878

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Barry Ricks (Board Member)
  • Krystle Ricks (Board Member)
  • Sheay Neilson (Board Member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to cultivate and advance the performing arts in the Magna Township and surrounding areas to serve as a distinguished arena for nurturing local talent and to provide cultural and educational experiences for the entire community by maintaining high standards of family-oriented quality programs and performances.

What it reported doing in 2024

The primary program service accomplishment are productions put on by the theater. The Theater serves as a community gathering place for families and performers to have an opportunity to perform and participate in recognized theater productions. Tickets to the theater are affordable for families in the surround Magna Township. Participation by actor musician and supporting technical and artistic crew enhances skills and attracts pride and attention to the Magna Township.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 80% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 31
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 59
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 28%; rating input score 28
  • Program expense ratio: 36.5%; rating input score 36

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 23.1%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.53; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 21.6% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 28% of revenue deployed · 36.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $45K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 28/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 36/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.