Options Pregnancy Clinic
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 911271323
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Olympia, WA, USA
- Phone
- 3607538023
- Rating
- 65
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Reproductive Health Care Facilities and Allied Services
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $793,232
- Expenses
- $693,764
- Assets
- $1,126,421
- Liabilities
- $10,992
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
People named in this filing
- RITA DROHMAN (BOARD CHAIRMAN)
- DR AL ROSER (MEMBER)
- ROB WARNER (BOARD VICE CHAIR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See schedule o
What it reported doing in 2025
Medical support services pregnancy tests are all pharmaceutical level urine tests and performed by a licensed nursing professional. The test is administered and results given in a timely fashion usually about 15 minutes from the time of the medical intake and administration of the urine test. First trimester ultrasounds are performed by a licensed registered nurse trained in ultrasound. Ultrasounds confirm an intrauterine pregnancy by three points gestational age determined by crown/rump measurements, fetal cardiac activity tracing and visually determining that the pregnancy is placed in the uterus. All ultrasounds are administered by our nurse professionals under the directorship of our volunteer medical director licensed practicing ob/gyn. Sexual health is offered in any language via a medical interpreter service. Std /sti testing for chlamydia and gonarrhea is adminstered through a urine test. The specimens are tested at the clinic for disease detection located in Texas. All tests are sent once per week via ups and the results are obtained within 24-48 hours
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 38
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 38.4%; rating input score 38
- Program expense ratio: 43.9%; rating input score 44
- Fundraising efficiency: $6.32 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 12.5%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.62; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 38.4% of revenue deployed · 43.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 38/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 44/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 22/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.