Options for Independent Livinginc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
391843312
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Green Bay, WI, USA
Phone
9204900500
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Centers to Support the Independence of Specific Populations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,896,361
Expenses
$2,229,616
Assets
$4,529,628
Liabilities
$120,462

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SCOTT ANDERSON (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • SCOTT ANDERSON (PRESIDENT)
  • CONNIE GREENWALD (VICE-PRESIDE)
  • JACOB RUATTI (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To assist people with disabilities in northeastern Wisconsin and the fox valley to live independently.

What it reported doing in 2024

Here are descriptions of the other programs provided by the organization: Wisconsin department of administration - division of housing - home program the organization receives grant funding to provide homeowner accessibility modifications for low-income individuals and families. The organization's staff provides assessment and eligibility assessments, coordinate modifications needed and supervise construction, and submit payments to contractors as specified in the contract. Funds are distributed as deferred mortgages at zero (0%) interest rate. The homeowner must repay the "loan" when they sell the home. The loans are shown on the statement of financial position as long-term notes receivable. If the notes are collected and not reinvested in homes for the same purpose, the funds are repaid to the Wisconsin department of administration - division of housing and are reflected as an expense in the statement of activities at that time. As part of the grant agreement the organization is allowed to request administrative funds as the grant progresses. Expenses associated with administrative revenues are reflected in the statement of activities. Benefits counseling - an individual with a disability is provided with a review of their current benefits and an explanation of how those benefits might be affected by employment, including available work incentive programs and alternate benefits for health and related services. Wisloan program - the organization provides outreach to the community about loans available to people with disabilities for assistive technology, home modifications or other related needs to allow individuals to be independent. Staff refers interested parties to independence first for loan application information. Personal care program - options for independent living, inc.'s personal care program empowers people with disabilities to manage their personal care services. Options for independent living, inc. Offers a consumer directed personal care program for people with disabilities who are (1) medicaid beneficiaries, (2) require personal care services and, (3) have identified an individual to provide personal care. Personal care may include assistance with bathing, dressing / undressing, prosthetics (braces, splints, and support hose), grooming, eating, mobility in the home, toileting, transfer incidental services (laundry, light housekeeping, and meal preparation), mostly oriented tasks and delegated tasks. Lend program (loaned equipment network distribution): through lend we accept used durable medical equipment in good condition, such as power and manual wheelchairs, tub transfer benches, commodes, walkers, portable ramps, and other equipment. After equipment is safety inspected and sanitized it is loaned to people with short-term needs for these devices.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 68% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 91
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 87.2%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: $19.23 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -17.6%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.03; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 87.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 57/100.