Opportunity Clark County

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
474260986
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Vancouver, WA, USA
Phone
3606945006
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,016
Expenses
$1,966
Assets
$6,811
Liabilities
$90

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JENNIFER BAKER (PRESIDENT & BOARD MEMBER)

People named in this filing

  • JENNIFER BAKER (PRESIDENT & BOARD MEMBER)
  • BRIAN FLEETWOOD (SECRETARY & BOARD MEMBER)
  • RYAN GREEAR (TREASURER & BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To improve the economic outcomes of the clark county, Washington area through research, strategy, regional convening, and major initiative coordination.

What it reported doing in 2025

In 2025, opportunity clark county (occ) solicited funds to contribute to our community's scholarship programs.by providing scholarship funds, occ supports the clark county comprehensive economic development plan strategic goal to support people, fostering an opportunity for skills development for students (future members of the workforce). Workforce capabilities drive business relocation decisions, and scholarships are one piece of the support people economic advancement pillar, which encompasses skills development and brain gain initiatives. Thus, with scholarship funding, occ helps support those initiatives.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 52
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 74
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 37.4%; rating input score 37
  • Program expense ratio: 76.3%; rating input score 76

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 51%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.46; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13.4% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 15.3% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 37.4% of revenue deployed · 76.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 37/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.