Operation Xcel Promoting Excellent Communities Education and Leadership

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
263948215
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2013
Location
Stokesdale, NC, USA
Phone
3363383384
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Educational Services and Schools - Other

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,743,618
Expenses
$1,663,397
Assets
$798,807
Liabilities
$55,816

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHARLENE GLADNEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • CHARLENE GLADNEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $95,680 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Recognizing the need to prepare children differently for success in the 21st century, operation xcel provides future-focused after-school, summer, and mentorship programs. We promote academic development and character growth through individual and target-based objectives, with a focus on individual development and achievement. We are guided by a strong work ethic and a dedication to community betterment. Through our academic and enrichment programs, we demonstrate our commitment - to providing equal access to quality educational resources, - to supporting diversity of thought, - to creating a strong foundation for the development of life long learners, - to fostering civic engagement, and to encouraging career mindfulness in our youth.

What it reported doing in 2024

Operation xcel operated four 21st century community learning centers (21st cclc) and four expanded learning and integrated support sites (eliss). This fiscal year, we served 810 students at eight North Carolina locations: two stokesdale sites, two high point sites, three greensboro sites, and one jamestown site. Most students come from low-income backgrounds and therefore would not have access to the type of services we provide. Operation xcel offers our services free to our families.we are guided by compassion, integrity, a strong work ethic, and a dedication to community betterment. Through our academic and enrichment programs, we demonstrate our commitment 1. To provide equal access to quality educational resources, 2. To support diversity of thought, 3. To create a strong foundation for the development of lifelong learners, 4. To foster civic engagement and 5. To encourage career mindfulness in our youth. Operation xcel is a place where learners are inspired to excel in every area of their lives and make meaningful changes in the world.we are passionate about giving our students and families all the time, resources, support, and encouragement they need to have the same opportunity to attain their goals as any other student. We collaborate with local schools to identify students that could benefit from our program. As we continue to grow and provide our services to more students and families, we are seeking new partnerships to support our programming that includes the following: operation homework is an academic enrichment program emphasizing math, reading, and science enrichment, homework completion, test preparation, social skill building, and the establishment of effective study habits. Through partnerships with parents, students, and school personnel, we work to establish a successful plan for each student. Each day, students receive academic assistance with homework, specialized skill building determined by individual needs, hands on enrichment activities in science and math, and social skills/character development. Operation 3 steps ahead is a summer enrichment program offering academic rigor and enrichment in fun and exciting lessons that are relevant to real world situations. We assessed all children and placed them in level appropriate reading, math and science classes. Certified teachers with specific expertise staffed classes. Students completed post assessments at the end of the summer to measure growth in reading, math, and science. Students focused on academic work in the morning hours and then had extracurricular activities in the afternoons after lunch. Activities included science and math enrichment, educational field trips, arts and crafts, indoor and outdoor games, guest speakers and off site recreation such as swimming. We provided breakfast and lunch.for 2024 -2025, operation xcel's assessments and data have yielded the following results:1. Operation xcel provided 130,736 hours of direct service 2. 97% of the students teachers confirm students showed improvement 3. 50 to 91% of 8th graders were proficient in science 4. Operation xcel saw a growth in english language arts proficiency of 50 to 89% 5. Operation xcel saw a growth in math proficiency in 92% of students by 27% 6. Operation xcel saw a 85% decrease in impulsivity the value of non-cash donations are as follows: donated meals: $ 113,613donated facilities: $ 321,440donated professional services: $ 8,750

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 71% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 85
  • Transparency & Controls: 87
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 84.1%; rating input score 84
  • Program expense ratio: 88.1%; rating input score 88
  • Fundraising efficiency: $75.02 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.6%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.48; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.8%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 15.4% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 15% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 18.5% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 84.1% of revenue deployed · 88.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $96K · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Audit committee oversight not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.