Operation Homefront

Legal name: Operation Homefront Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
320033325
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
San Antonio, TX, USA
Phone
(210) 659-7756
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community, Neighborhood Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$55,582,313
Expenses
$49,307,086
Assets
$59,889,352
Liabilities
$3,252,382

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

32 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ALAN J REYES (PRESIDENT & CEO)
  • ROBERT THOMAS (PRESIDENT & COO (THRU 04/2025))
  • ANTHONY BARNETT (VICE PRESIDENT OF MARKETING)

Highest reported compensation

  • ALAN J REYES (PRESIDENT & CEO): $466,549 total reported compensation
  • REGAN HUNEYCUTT (CHIEF REVENUE OFFICER): $289,352 total reported compensation
  • ROBERT THOMAS (PRESIDENT & COO (THRU 04/2025)): $255,889 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To build strong, stable, and secure military and veteran families by improving their financial, emotional, and social well-being.

What it reported doing in 2025

Operation homefront assists military families coping with a variety of financial challenges. The most common type of needs are for relief consisting of rent/mortgage assistance, groceries/utility bills, home repairs, transportation related expenses and transitional and permanent housing; and recurring family support consisting of holiday meals, holiday toys, back-to-school items, homefront celebrations, and baby showers designed to ensure the long term empowerment, self sufficiency, and resilience of our military families.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 65% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 56
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 76.7%; rating input score 77
  • Program expense ratio: 84.3%; rating input score 84
  • Fundraising efficiency: $11.57 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 95%; rating input score 95; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 40.9%; rating input score 41; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 91.3%; rating input score 91; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11.3%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.21; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.1%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -3% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.3% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
  • Where the money goes: 76.7% of revenue deployed · 84.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 21 of 23 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $41.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $467K · 32 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $3M reported
  • Consistency: 39 of 40 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 41/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 30/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.