Operation Give a Damn Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
371962002
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
San Francisco, CA, USA
Phone
4156358119
Rating
92
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Services N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$18,000
Expenses
$8,527
Assets
$42,244
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Dani Robillard (President)

People named in this filing

  • Dani Robillard (President)
  • Dustin Cardaropoli (Secretary)
  • Grace Emmanuel (CFO)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide goods and material items to the needy, homeless and people in need. Goods and materials can be hygiene items such as soaps, dental care, clothing, pre-packaged food items, and transportation needs if available. Our organization purchased items for distribution thru out the cities of San Francisco and Oakland, CA.

What it reported doing in 2024

Organization was able to acquire funds during the year of 2024 to perform material distributions of clothing, food, water, supplies, to folks in need during the year 2024. Twelve events were able to be held and served as a vehicle to perform these distributions to citizens in need. Events and distributions were held within the cities of San Francisco and Oakland to citizens in need and did not have access to basic needs. Distributed items were purchased with donated funds to the organization. Monthly "pop up" distributions were performed through out multiple cities in various locations and offered assistance to the local residents in need. Distributions included items such as toiletries, socks, various clothing items, material handling carts for mobility purposes, packaged food items, shoes, bedding, tools, batteries, water, basic first-aid supplies, and hot meals when available . Many individuals placed requests for items which were purchased then distributed at a later date to individuals that had made the requests. Return visits to distribution sites assisted in these allocations of requested materials.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 83
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 52.6%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.95; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 36.5% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 25.1% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 47.5% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $20K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.