Operation For HOPE Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 262030057
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- La Jolla, CA, United States
- Phone
- 888-467-3008
- Rating
- 65
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Family Violence Shelters
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $100,065
- Expenses
- $26,255
- Assets
- $296,221
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Kimberly Weisz (President)
People named in this filing
- Bob Martin (Chair)
- Gina Coburn (Secretary)
- Kimberly Weisz (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Urgent aid. Lasting change. We amplify understanding of the impact of domestic violence on families. We provide urgent financial aid, empowering victims to escape abuse, heal, and build a safer future. Who We Help People We Serve. © 2026 Operation For HOPE Foundation, Inc. — A registered 501(c)(3) nonprofit. EIN: 26-2030057 SAFETY EXIT.
What it reported doing in 2025
Provided emergency financial assistance grants to domestic violence survivors to help them safely leave abusive situations and secure housing, food, and other necessities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 48% for direct work, and 52% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 35
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 91
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 17.4%; rating input score 17
- Program expense ratio: 66.4%; rating input score 66
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 73.8%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.28; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -25.5% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 29.2% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 28.5% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 17.4% of revenue deployed · 66.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $17K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 17/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.