OpenMRS1 Limited DBA OPENMRS INC

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
455316647
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Indianapolis, IN, USA
Phone
4053626677
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Management & Technical Assistance

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,375,601
Expenses
$1,346,922
Assets
$1,339,767
Liabilities
$153,811

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jan Flowers (President)

People named in this filing

  • Jan Flowers (President)
  • Mitchell Baker (Board Member)
  • Christopher Bailey (Board Member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Openmrs inc's purpose is to provide the openmrs community in its mission to improve health care delivery in resource-constrained environments, including developing countries; and work with the coordinating a global community to create and support software to manage medical records and other health care systems in developing countries and to resourceconstrained environments. The inc. AIDS in creating and distributing openmrs by securing cash, hardware, and other donations, then using donations to aid openmrs development and promotion. The organization was originally founded as openmrs, llc to create a legal entity capable of representing the openmrs project. The growing popularity of openmrs also made it neccessary to establish a thin organizational layer that is capable of handling all legal and financial interests of the openmrs community process.

What it reported doing in 2024

OpenMRS continues to be resolute in its mission. Embracing teamwork, the OpenMRS community has been able to make great strides in improving health care delivery in resource-constrained environments by creating a robust, scalable, user-driven, open source medical record system platform. The achievements during the year include: Third-Party Security Validation: Engaged independent security experts to conduct comprehensive penetration testing of the O3 Reference Application. The assessment included a thorough review against the OWASP Top 10 most critical web application security risks. Successfully achieved Compliance Certificate, demonstrating the Platform meets rigorous security standards and industry best practices.Security Improvements: Implemented comprehensive security enhancements including more rigorous application of permission checks and a permission model for global properties. Conducted review of several REST endpoints to ensure appropriate privileges and authentication. Migrated to a whitelisting mechanism for unauthenticated URLs. Implemented an auditing framework and moved to XStream whitelisting.Major Platform and Application Releases: Released major upgrade to Platform 2.7, including security fixes and a two-fold increase in Developer performance speed due to boot-up time improvements. Also released Platform 2.8-alpha (SNAPSHOT) for community testing. Platform 2.8 release includes foundational Java upgrades (better security and DevX), Spring upgrades, and much more. O3 Releases: Released and pre-released major upgrades to O3 (3.2.1, 3.3.0, and 3.4) that delivered performance enhancements, new feature additions, and essential bug fixes to O3. Substantial O3 RefApp QA/testing activities were conducted alongside comprehensive issue identification.Quality Assurance: Reviewed all O3 UI tests for gaps, and added additional O3 automated test coverage. Design QA: Review of community-contributed features for design consistency and usability. For instance, supported design inputs for IPD Squad.Content Packages and Developer Tools: Improved the OpenMRS SDK to automatically handle content package components that previously required manual file arranging. Improved documentation for developers aiming to develop and re-use content.Feature Squad Support: Provided guidance to a steady number of O3 Feature Squads to facilitate alignment and prioritization among OpenMRS Implementing Organizations working on O3, and to further a broader suite of O3 features.New Squad Initiatives: Documentation Revival Squad: Launched effort to harmonize Implementer & Developer guidance documents. Successfully unified and updated a one-stop O3 Developer Guide in the OpenMRS Wiki, and initiated improvements to Reporting Documentation.Localization Squad: Launched focused efforts to improve translation workflows, training resources, and governance that will benefit non-English PEPFAR-supported sites (including DRC). Also provided translated courses including the Intro to O3 for Devs and Form Builder courses, into Spanish and French, particularly to aid capacity building in O3 and Form Building in both Cote dIvoire and DRC.Google Summer of Code: Supported projects initiated through Google Summer of Code by providing dedicated mentorship, significant requirements planning, and community priority alignmentprojects aimed at benefiting TAP and PEPFAR organizations. Key projects included: Interactive Builder for Form Translations within the Form Builder (particularly beneficial for DRC), Improved Audit Logging, OpenMRS Standalone Replacement, Performance Testing Enhancement, Fast Data Entry Feature Fix, and Immunization Schedule App for O3.Standards and Interoperability: Gave an award-winning presentation on how OpenMRS has successfully adopted FHIR standards for data exchange (without needing to replace the backend), at the first ever ODHS (Open Digital Health Summit).Capacity Building and Training: Facilitated 1-week training in Kinshasa on OpenMRS in gener

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 96
  • Transparency & Controls: 55
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 95.7%; rating input score 96
  • Program expense ratio: 97.7%; rating input score 98
  • Fundraising efficiency: $115.54 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.1%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.99; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 31.3% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 23.1% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 15.4% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 95.7% of revenue deployed · 97.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $116K reported
  • Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.