OpenAI Foundation Fka OpenAI Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 810861541
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2015
- Location
- San Francisco, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4158799686
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Engineering and Technology
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $691,271
- Expenses
- $7,775,308
- Assets
- $14,665,036
- Liabilities
- $616,733
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Sam Altman (Dir/Pres/CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Gregory Brockman (Dir/Pres (Former)): $264,189 total reported compensation
- Chris Clark (Treas/Sec): $216,021 total reported compensation
- Lawrence Summers (Director): $143,702 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
OpenAIs mission is to ensure that artificial general intelligence benefits all of humanity.
What it reported doing in 2024
Since its founding, the Organization has undertaken a wide range of charitable initiatives, such as sponsoring a comprehensive basic income study, supporting economic impact research, and experimenting with education-centered programs like OpenAI Foundation Scholars. The Organizations efforts also included supporting a number of other public charities focused on AI research, safety, and economic impact. In 2024, among other grant initiatives, the Organization supported a number of AI alignment research, AI safety research, and economic empowerment initiatives. The Organization is the governing body for all of OpenAI Foundation and holds an interest in OpenAI Foundations operating entities. Each of the Organizations related organizations is legally bound to pursue the Organizations mission. Through its control of the OpenAI for-profit entities, additional milestones were accomplished in 2024 including: 1. In furtherance of its research initiatives and taking steps towards safe deployment of powerful model capabilities, OpenAI shared early research progress for Soraa long-duration, high-fidelity text-to-video model. In parallel, the model was made available to domain experts in areas like misinformation, hateful content, and bias to provide valuable testing, and OpenAI engaged with policymakers, educators and artists around the world to understand their concerns and to identify positive use cases for this new technology.2. Recognizing the importance of building general-purpose artificial intelligence that safely benefits humanity as AI models reach new levels of capabilities, the Organization formed the independent Safety and Security Committee (SSC) in May, 2024, currently chaired by director Zico Kolter, to oversee critical safety and security measures related to model development and deployment. Over a period of 90 days, the SSC developed recommendations across five key areas ranging from independent governance, security enhancement, transparency, collaboration, and unifying safety frameworks, which the Organization and its related entities adopted. 3. Continuing its commitment to make the benefit of artificial intelligence widely available and broadly beneficial, OpenAI made available for free the OpenAI o1-mini model, a faster, cheaper reasoning model that is particularly effective at coding, making it a powerful, cost-effective model for developers around the world.4. As part of exploring how AI benefits the scientific community, OpenAI and Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) one of the United States leading national laboratories announced a partnership to study how artificial intelligence can be used safely by scientists in laboratory settings to advance bioscientific research.5. As part of ongoing alignment and safety research, OpenAI introduced deliberative alignmenta training paradigm that directly teaches reasoning LLMs the text of human-written and interpretable safety specifications. In addition, OpenAI shared two papers on red teaminga white paper detailing how we engage external red teamers to test our frontier models, and a research study that introduces a new method for automated red teaming.These contributions to the advancement of AI technology, along with the continuous study on the broader benefits and impacts of AI, are critical steps in moving the Organization towards the development of safe, effective, and productive general-purpose artificial intelligence that benefits all humanity.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 99% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 98.7%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1,024.8%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.89; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.7%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -20.8% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -24.6% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 98.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $264K · 12 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 23 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 27 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 54/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 59/100.