Open Web Device Compliance Review Board Forum

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
471450532
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2019
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
Mountain View, CA, USA
Phone
8583455720
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Printing, Publishing

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$59,623
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • David Bryant (President)

People named in this filing

  • David Bryant (President)
  • Jean Gong (CFO)
  • Yong Chang (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Open Web Device Compliance Review Board Forum (the Corporation) is organized and operated exclusively for purposes described in Section 501(c)(6) of the Code by engaging in activities that further the common business interests of the members of the Corporation, including, but not limited to, establishing common compliance criteria and a program of testing and certification within the open web device industry for the benefit of such industry.

What it reported doing in 2019

The Open Web Device CRB (compliance review board) focuses on: API compatibility Minimum performance benchmarksOur accomplishments:1. Holding membership meetings2. Meetings with field experts3. Established compliance criteria4. Established performance benchmarks5 OWDCRD certified 2 products: Alcatel OneTouch Fire C Alcatel OneTouch Fire E6. We had authorized 1 lab

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: -45.2% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2016 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.