Open Supply Hub Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
845010884
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Hudson, NY, USA
Phone
4132747551
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Human Rights

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,782,518
Expenses
$3,358,608
Assets
$3,961,957
Liabilities
$292,081

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

23 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • NATALIE GRILLON (CEO/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • KATHLEEN CHAPMAN (CTO): $224,518 total reported compensation
  • NATALIE GRILLON (CEO/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $222,365 total reported compensation
  • MANISHA RIA SHAH (CFO/COO): $190,887 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To make supply chain data open, accessible and trusted for the public benefit. Os hub stewards data, providing a single, essential reference point, that enables stakeholders to collectively address challenges and drive progress for human rights and the environment.

What it reported doing in 2025

The volume of data hosted on open supply hub grew 148%, with 2,519,152 production locations openly mapped across 225 countries and territories by the end of 2025. This data was uploaded by 3,763 contributors (161% growth) from brands/retailers, civil society, certification schemes, multistakeholder initiatives (msis) and others, as well as publicly available datasets uploaded by the open supply hub team. By the end of the year, agriculture was the sector most represented in the data followed by general merchandise, manufacturing, apparel, and maintenance & repair. In 2025, we launched new data partnerships to increase the visibility stakeholders have into social and environmental data available about a production location; released a report informing tech providers how to make platforms more accessible to civil society and unions users; improved both usability and usefulness of the platform for suppliers; and developed bespoke maps to facilitate collaboration following humanitarian crises.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 86% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 57
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 72.8%; rating input score 73
  • Program expense ratio: 82%; rating input score 82
  • Fundraising efficiency: $49.04 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11.2%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.18; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 37%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 23.3% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 22% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.5% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 72.8% of revenue deployed · 82% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $225K · 23 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $948K reported
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 54/100.