Open Door Biblical Counseling Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
844351774
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Greenville, SC, USA
Phone
8644145649
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Personal Social Services
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$69,183
Expenses
$66,226
Assets
$13,412
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • STEPHEN ELLIS (PRESIDENT)
  • ROY ELLISON (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • STEPHEN ELLIS (PRESIDENT)
  • ROY ELLISON (PRESIDENT)
  • DENNIS E PORTER (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Organization is organized exclusively foe charitable religious educational and scientific purposes including for such purposes, the making of distributions to organizations that qualify as exempt organizations under 501 (C3) of the IRS code, or corresponding section of any future federal tax code. Purpose is to provide Christian counseling in a confidential personal environment. That approaches every person as a uniquely gifted and wonderful creation of God.

What it reported doing in 2025

We had over 1200 appointments for counseling approximately 10% (117) of these appointments were no charge about 25% (298) were with pastors and staff from area churches about 5% (58) were scholarship aapointments for clients that could not afford to pay for them about 5% (59) were with veterans almost 2% (18) of them were with first responders

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 64% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.3%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.2; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 15.3% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 6 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.