Open Door Action Ministries Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
820539691
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2011
Official website data refreshed
Jun 2026
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2011
Location
Reidsville, NC, USA
Phone
3368333175
Rating
43
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Interfaith Coalitions
Affiliation
Interfaith

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$46,645
Expenses
$47,020
Assets
$3,669

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Central American Missions Projects- Such as facilitating short term mission teams to aid Central American families, by providing building materials, medical supplies, educational resources, etc.

What it reported doing in 2011

Human Services Programs, General/Other: Contributions from our supporters have allowed us to provide short term mission teams (from 10-40 volunteers per trip) from the US to help build schools and homes for families in Central America. One such school now has 200+ (estimate) children being taught a quality education that otherwise would not be attainable based on their socioeconomic status. Our supporters contributions have provided text books, computers, teachers salaries, etc.We are also involved with supporting a training center that teaches adults how to raise their own crops, livestock, and fish for their own consumption and as a means of income. Also taught are basic sewing, welding, brick making as means of supporting their families. Various ministries are served and there has been great progress in helping these people who had become accustomed to receiving handouts, to now provide for themselves, which has brought great pride to an otherwise downtrodden people group.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 24
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.8%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.08; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 45.9% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -9.7% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2010 to 2011
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.