Onward Israel Internships and Opportunities Ltd
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 981361711
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2022
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2123396941
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,820
- Expenses
- $1,412,785
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ILAN WAGNER (PRESIDENT & CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
- ELIRAN COHEN (VICE PRESIDENT FOR OP & BUSINESS)
- SCOTT COPELAND (VICE PRESIDENT FOR EDUCATION)
People named in this filing
- DAVID SHAPIRA (BOARD CHAIRMAN)
- CYNTHIA SHAPIRA (BOARD MEMBER)
- LYNNE COHEN (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Onward israel internships and opportunities, ltd company for public benefit onward israel, ltd was established in coordination with the incorporation of onward israel USA, inc. Onward israel, ltd helps to carry out the mission of and accordingly receives funding from onward israel USA, inc. The mission of both organizations is to strengthen jewish identity among young men and women, support jewish values and traditions, and foster a connection between young people and contemporary israeli society.
What it reported doing in 2022
Onward israel internships and opportunities, ltd merged with taglit, an israel entity, to continue strengthening jewish identity among young men and women, supporting jewish values and traditions, and fostering a connection between young people and contemporary israeli society.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 98
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 95.2%; rating input score 95
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -36,883.9%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -11.4% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -27.7% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 95.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.