Onward Hope Incorporated

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
465002929
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2016
Location
Phoenix, AZ, USA
Rating
47
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Family Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$458,829
Expenses
$395,290
Assets
$52,209
Liabilities
$90,044

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHASEN DOBRANSKI (PRESIDENT)
  • ESHAWN PETERSON (CEO)

People named in this filing

  • CHASEN DOBRANSKI (PRESIDENT)
  • ESHAWN PETERSON (CEO)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We are committed to improving and assisting the successful transition of at-risk young people to independent adulthood and supporting resilient families, by connecting them to resources.

What it reported doing in 2025

In the year 2025, our foster care and adoption services program continued its unwavering commitment to transforming the lives of vulnerable youth and families in Arizona. Throughout the year we extended our reach and impact through a range of strategic initiatives and heartfelt engagements. 1. Comprehensive training and support: serving multiple families over several training sessions, our objective was to equip families with the essential knowledge and skills needed to provide a nurturing and stable environment for Arizona's most vulnerable youth. By offering specialized training and ongoing support, we aimed to strengthen family bonds and promote healthier outcomes for children in the foster care system. Long term goals: our long-term goal revolves around building a robust community of empowered caregivers who are capable of fostering positive change in the lives of children. By ensuring that families recieve the guidance they need, we aim to create a sustainable support network that extends far beyond their immediate engagement with our organization. 2. Successful reunifications and adoptions: with hundreds of individuals served, dozens of fostered children, and several families reunified and children adopted, we have remained dedicated to achieving stable and loving homes for children by facilitating reunifications and adoptions. Our specialized approach allowed us to successfully reunify multiple families, reuniting children with their biological family whenever possible. Additionally, we have had several successful adoptions completed, providing permanent and secure families for children who had experienced uncertainty. Long term goal: our overarching goal is to significantly contribute to reducing the number of children in the foster care system by facilitating successful reunifications and adoptions. By focusing on individualized plans with extensive support, we strive to minimize the time children spend in foster care and maximize the opportunities for lifelong stability. 3. Community engagement events. Over the course of several events with hundreds of youth beneficiaries, we aimed to raise awareness about foster care and adoption while celebrating the resilience of children and families in our program. Our long term goal is to foster a culture of community engagement and support for children and families involved in the foster care and adoption journey. By hosting annual events, we seek to increase public understanding of the challenges faced by these families and generate greater empathy and involvement from the broader community. In 2026, we proudly continue our commitment to being a beacon of hope for children and families. Through our foster care and adoption services, comprehensive training, family-centered support, successful reunifications, and community partnerships, we are helping build stronger families and brighter futures. Every child deserves the opportunity to grow up in a safe, loving, and nurturing home, and together with our community, we are making that vision a reality.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 83% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 28
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 30
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 26.5%; rating input score 26
  • Program expense ratio: 30.7%; rating input score 31
  • Fundraising efficiency: $8.55 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.8%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.13; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.72; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -55.6% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -17.4% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 21% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 26.5% of revenue deployed · 30.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 2 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $122K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 26/100.
  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 31/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 33/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.