OnMain Inc C/o University of Dayton
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 832877212
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Dayton, OH, USA
- Phone
- 9372292890
- Rating
- 65
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Economic Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $11,665,968
- Expenses
- $7,582,018
- Assets
- $56,110,675
- Liabilities
- $53,493,121
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Brian C Heitkamp (CEO)
- Mariah Vogelgesang (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- Andrew T Horner (Director, Assistant Treasurer): $713,668 total reported compensation
- Joann Ringer (Treasurer, Secretary): $674,592 total reported compensation
- Mary Ann P Recker JD (Director): $390,050 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The vision is to represent Dayton as a city of innovation, entrepreneurialism, creativity, sustainability, and inclusiveness, while establishing a unique platform to create, build, and demonstrate solutions across a range of disciplines from health care, energy, housing, environment, business creation, and neighborhood well-being.
What it reported doing in 2025
Establish core infrastructure to further create a critical mass of activity with a mix of employment, housing, retail, and supportive community users.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 100% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 80% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 73
- Accountability: 35
- Sustainability: 74
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 65%; rating input score 65
- Program expense ratio: 99.9%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 28.6%; rating input score 29; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 35%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.4; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.95; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.9%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 43.9% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 49.5% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 53.9% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 65% of revenue deployed · 99.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 7 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $714K · 10 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 29/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.