Oniyabison Us

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
931838054
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-PF 2024
Location
La Jara, CO, USA
Phone
3037096404
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Natural Resources Conservation and Protection

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$106
Assets
$50
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TARA SHEAHAN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • TARA SHEAHAN (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

OniyaBison is a bison farm and retreat for individuals to come and study and monitor bison. The bison are in a field and safely provided for. The bison are fed well and have been approved by the state authorities for study and research. The Field is well maintained and the guests are provided housing and food. The guests are provided tours as well as time to spend watching and studying the bison. Bison are such beautiful animals.The bison are on an area known as Jacob's hill in Capulin Colorado. The bison are natural to the San Luis Valley in Colorado. Bison are big and beautiful animals that have played a huge part in the role of the united states western and native american history. There is also the Alamosa river that feeds a stream through the area that the bison live and that is where they are watered. There are also water troughs near the main lodge. It is a beautiful area where there the sunsets and sunrises are breathtaking. This non profit organization is a beautiful way to wa

What it reported doing in 2025

Bison Education

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 23
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.47; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 1 filing year from 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.