Oneworld Rowing
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 851798026
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- IVY, VA, USA
- Phone
- 4349806470
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,484
- Expenses
- $16,589
- Assets
- $6,939
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
People named in this filing
- CHRISTOPHER H JACKSON (PRES,TREASUR)
- ELEANOR A BRAUN (SECRETARY &)
- DENISE CENIT (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide support and foster the development of the amateur sport of rowing and support the development of amateur athletes for national and international competition
What it reported doing in 2025
Pro bono support services - new and continuing activities in 2025: athlete wellness & performance - physical/athletic therapy in 2025 oneworld issued a total of 8,500.00 in program payments to licensed (mspt, dpt, or dat) professional physical and athletic therapists (pt's & at's) actively serving college club, high performance (hp), and other amateur rowers. That total was dispensed as follows: 3,000 was paid to cg athletic therapy llc/helen gallagher dat to help helen provide discounted athletic therapy sessions in january-september 2025 to amateur pre-elite/elite hp athletes at penn ac rowing association hpg and other amateur hp rowers in philadelphia. Helen has extensive experience providing athletic therapy (at) to hp and other rowers and has also planned presentations to share with other at professionals on specifics of working with rowers. 1,500 was paid to motive sports & physical therapy llc/abigail bogovich dpt to help abigail provide discounted physical therapy sessions in october-december 2025 to amateur pre-elite/elite hp athletes at penn ac rowing hpg and to help abigail launch motive's new proactive pt effort entitled "rowing performance program - helping athletes stay strong & injury-free." 1,500 was paid to the next step physical therapy/karen calara mspt to help provide pro bono/discounted physical therapy sessions to amateur pre-elite hp rowers at a nascent seattle-based hp training group established in 2025 by former u.s. National team lightweight rower & current university of Washington assistant coach kate bertko. Karen has extensive experience providing physical therapy, rowing stroke analysis, and advice on incorporating proactive pt considerations into training programs for teams and individuals. 1,500 was paid to power house physio llc/lisa lowe dpt to help provide discounts on power house physio's online curriculum "keys to working with rowers" which lisa created to help pt's, at's, strength & conditioning (s&c) coaches, et al. Better understand the bio-mechanics and pt considerations specific to the sport of rowing. The discount was offered to those working with athletes from acra college club or ncaa division iii programs. Lisa has extensive experience providing pt to hp, para-athletes and other rowers and conferring with other pt's on the sport. 1,000 was paid to ricker adkins dat to help provide discounted athletic therapy sessions in october-december 2025 to amateur pre-elite and elite hp athletes at penn ac rowing association hpg and other amateur hp rowers in philadelphia. Ricker has extensive experience providing athletic therapy (at) to hp and other athletes from many sports.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 61% for direct work, and 39% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 94
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 16
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 83.8%; rating input score 84
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1,017.9%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.42; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -13.5% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -54.5% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -27.6% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 83.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $14K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.