Oneonta Police Benevolent Assoc Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
161060134
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Oneonta, NY, USA
Phone
6074321113
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$17,123
Expenses
$10,522
Assets
$92,753

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DETECTIVE AMANDA CATAPANO (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DETECTIVE AMANDA CATAPANO (PRESIDENT)
  • DETECTIVE EDMUND C DONLEY (VICE PRESIDE)
  • POLICE OFFICER SCOTT SHELDON (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To educate the public about the police profession, to gain greater economic status, promote good fellowship, exchange information with other law enforcement organizations, work in the interest of good police work, and protect the interest and rights of all members, and to maintain a club room for members in good standing.

What it reported doing in 2025

Supplies, flags and grave markers, conferences, department functions, flowers & gifts, serverance pay, legal fees, insurance and utilities for promotion of good police work.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 84% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Multi-channel. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 42% for direct work, 40% for grants, and 18% for member benefits.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 71
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 68
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 57.9%; rating input score 58
  • Program expense ratio: 91.7%; rating input score 92

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 38.6%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.82; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 16.6%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -12.5% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -11.1% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 57.9% of revenue deployed · 91.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $10K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.