Oneonta Foundation for Educational Resources Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
631242866
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2014
Location
Oneonta, AL, USA
Phone
2056255558
Rating
50
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards

Reported finances

Revenue
$34,210
Expenses
$15,452
Assets
$183,571
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANGELA HENDERSON (PRESIDENT)
  • JEREMY HYDE (VICE-PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ANGELA HENDERSON (PRESIDENT)
  • JEREMY HYDE (VICE-PRESIDENT)
  • SHANNON CARDWELL (TREASURER/COORDINATOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of oneonta's foundation for educational resources (offer) is to support oneonta city schools in providing a challenging and enriching educational experience, maximizing the learning potential of every student while forming the cornerstone of our community's future.

What it reported doing in 2024

Teacher of the year grants awarded to teachers at each level of education for the purpose of classroom improvements.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 9
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 85
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 5.8%; rating input score 6
  • Program expense ratio: 12.9%; rating input score 13

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 54.8%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.88; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -22.8% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -12.3% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 5.8% of revenue deployed · 12.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $2K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 6/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 13/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.