One West Tourism Alliance Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
680486847
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2023
Forms available
Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2016
Location
San Francisco, CA, USA
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Historical Societies, Related Historical Activities

Reported finances

Revenue
$43,016
Expenses
$148,174
Assets
$157,767
Liabilities
$84,935

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BROOK KAUFMAN (PRESIDENT)
  • ANGIE VILLERY (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • BRENT DERAAD (PAST PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • BROOK KAUFMAN (PRESIDENT)
  • ANGIE VILLERY (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MARK THOMPSON (SEC TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The basic purpose of the foundation is to acquire resources from both public and private sector sources to develop educational scholarship and research programs related to the convention and visitor industry.

What it reported doing in 2023

To conduct educational and training classes and programs. To provide access to educational and training classes and programs through scholarship programs. To conduct research associated with travel and visitor inducstries

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 77% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 98
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 24
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 94.8%; rating input score 95

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -244.5%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.06; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.54; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -14.3% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 94.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $140K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2018 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.