One Vision

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
420953968
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Clear Lake, IA, USA
Phone
6413575277
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Housing Development, Construction, Management

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$27,904,804
Expenses
$26,582,863
Assets
$28,344,484
Liabilities
$12,140,602

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

17 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Dennis Plautz (President)
  • Jane Fischer (Vice President)
  • Aimee Kern (Past President)
  • Mark Dodd (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • Mark Dodd (CEO): $295,130 total reported compensation
  • Mario Van Dijk (CFO): $214,467 total reported compensation
  • Adrienne Baker (Team Leader): $184,182 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The One Vision community supports individual choice by providing services that lead to greater purpose and independence.

What it reported doing in 2024

One Vision is a private, non-profit, charitable, human services organization dedicated to supporting people with disabilities to pursue their best life. One Vision does so through a variety of services and supports, so the individuals can be successful at home, work and in their community.One Vision is based in Clear Lake, Iowa, in the north central part of the state. Our services reach into more than 20 communities, and individuals come from across the state seeking our support. One Vision provides a caring, supportive atmosphere for approximately 300 people who receive one or more types of service from One Vision. Ages range from infants to senior citizens. Disabilities include intellectual disabilities, mental illness, cerebral palsy, seizure disorders, brain injury, autism, and more.The services provided at One Vision are accredited by the Council on Quality and Leadership (CQL). We currently have a 4-year accreditation up for renewal in June 2027.ResidentialThe Organization helps individuals with disabilities to find affordable, safe, and comfortable homes in Iowa communities of their choice. One Vision staff support each person to live as independently as possible, while providing appropriate assistance based on individual needs.EmploymentThe Organization supports individuals with disabilities to achieve success at work. It starts with discovery. Staff get to know a person outside of work, look at their home environment, find out when and where they are at their best, and assess skills and interests. They offer training to improve skills and the opportunity to learn about different types of work by visiting businesses or trying out a job for ten days. The Organization supports individuals with disabilities to achieve success in the communities where they live and the wider world. Success for some might mean volunteering at a local community kitchen or at a state park picking up trash. For another, it may mean going to the grocery store like everyone else in town, to choose favorite items and pay for them.Business EnterprisesThe Organization operates thrift stores and a recycling center which also offer work-related opportunities for those individuals it serves. This business is operated in conjunction with the other program services previously mentioned.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 80% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 80
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 74.4%; rating input score 74
  • Program expense ratio: 72.8%; rating input score 73
  • Fundraising efficiency: $33.51 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.7%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.07; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.43; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.9%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -1% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 74.4% of revenue deployed · 72.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $19.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $295K · 17 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $1.1M reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 9 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 52/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.