ONE Tennessee

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
831487663
IRS 990 coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Brentwood, TN, USA
Rating
64
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Support N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$374,231
Expenses
$322,881
Assets
$88,183
Liabilities
$18,080

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Anthony Pudlo (Vice President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Liesa Jenkins (Executive Dir.): $90,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

COACH TN, dba ONE Tennessee's mission is to address chronic pain and to prevent overdose and addiction through collaboration, clinical education, and coordination of services

What it reported doing in 2024

Since 2018, ONE Tennessee has worked to reduce the impact of the opioid epidemic on people and communities in Tennessee through collaboration, clinical education and coordination of services. In FY25, ONE Tennessee supported 9 health professionals (physicians, nurses, and pharmacists) to serve as academic detailers who engaged with 111 of their professional colleagues to share educational information and resources for appropriate prescribing of opioids to treat chronic pain, screening for misuse and/or dependency, recommended methods of treatment for substance use disorders, and resources for other support services such as housing, transportation, employment assistance, and peer recovery support. In addition, program staff served as preceptor for 2 graduate students in the fields of pharmacy and public health. To improve coordination among health professionals and other service providers, ONE Tennessee has continued to support the Upper Cumberland Human Resource Agency as it has expanded capacity to serve individuals in each of the region? s 14 counties. In FY25, ONE Tennessee has assisted to identify, engage, train and support clinical experts to conduct intake, triage, and referral to services that meet the needs of 358 individuals in the Upper Cumberland Recovery CONNECT program, while also helping to design and configure infrastructure for data collection, monitoring and reporting, analysis and evaluation to improve program operations and impact. In FY25, 212 individuals participated in the program, with an average of 5 referrals to services for individuals and an average of 4 follow-up contacts by a certified peer recovery specialist. As a result of these coordinated services, 127 individuals had achieved their 90-day recovery milestone, 32 had achieved their 60-day recovery milestone, and 16 had achieved their 30-day recovery milestone.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 95% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 61
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 31
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 64.8%; rating input score 65
  • Program expense ratio: 75.1%; rating input score 75
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.7%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.27; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.21; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 27.9%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13.2% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -7.4% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 64.8% of revenue deployed · 75.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 12 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $243K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $90K · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.