One Sheep Ministries

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
813882689
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
Monroe, MI, USA
Rating
63
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$117,447
Expenses
$73,330
Assets
$62,530

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Isac L Smith (President)
  • Bonnie Sorter (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Isac L Smith (President)
  • Bonnie Sorter (Vice President)
  • Amy Cevora (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

One Sheep Ministries exists to provide financial support for individuals and families in distress by providing funding for emergency food shelter transportation utilities clothing and other support. Additionally we provide funding to Christian schools to support classroom development and teaching instructional aids. Our income is derived from fund-raising gifts and donations. All income is used to support our Mission and no salaries or overhead is incurred in providing support to our mission.

What it reported doing in 2025

One Sheep Ministries prepared served meals each month in warming shelters or homeless shelters serving an average of 175 persons monthly in Monroe County MI. One Sheep Ministries operated a mobile Food Pantry operated a monthly Mobile Food Pantry three time in the year serving an average of 210 households in Monroe County MI each time. One Sheep Ministries provided funding to Christian Schools in Uganda and Kenya to install a water well latrine build classrooms provide instructional aids and teaching tools. One Sheep Ministries provided funding for a Christian School in India to build a utility and tool shed and to construct a retaining wall and fence.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 39
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 64
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 62.4%; rating input score 62
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 37.6%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.85; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 62.4% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.