One Organized Neighbors of Edgehill Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
621540325
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Nashville, TN, USA
Phone
6152564617
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$94,042
Expenses
$112,108
Assets
$379,261
Liabilities
$1,556

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Deborah Hampton (Director, Board Chair)
  • Stanley Kinnard (Director, Treasurer)
  • Cheryl Griggs (Director Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Neighborhood revitalization and leadership development

What it reported doing in 2024

Neighborhood Organizing & Family Assistance: Supported families with counseling and knowledge of access to resources . Maintained a Community Garden. This involved 32 gardeners, 63 volunteers, some neighborhood youth and Youth Works, Inc.; Sponsored our annual "One Night Out Against Crime." Over 150 residents came out to visit 26 booths for information and referrals. Co-sponsored monthly "Lunch and Learn" events with speakers on topics of interest to the residents, like stages of grief, Medicare and Medicaid policies and presentations by local police officers on crime stats for our community. About 25-30 people attended. In collaboration with MDHA and Metro Action Commission, provided 1,300 lunches thru the summer lunch program.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 60% for direct work, and 40% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 60
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 64.6%; rating input score 65
  • Program expense ratio: 53%; rating input score 53

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -19.2%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.38; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -5.7% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.6% per year; rating input score 0; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 64.6% of revenue deployed · 53% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $59K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 53/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.