One Mission Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
263741880
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Newton, MA, USA
Phone
5086289090
Rating
71
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Patient Services - Entertainment, Recreation

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,209,264
Expenses
$1,113,119
Assets
$1,421,390
Liabilities
$91,270

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ASHLEY HASEOTES (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
  • ARI HASEOTES (VICE PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • ABBY PASTYRNAK (MANAGING DIRECTOR): $152,909 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

One mission is a pediatric cancer charity dedicated to improving the lives of children and families from diagnosis, through treatment, and beyond. (continued on schedule o) through programs that provide emotional, practical, and financial support, one mission helps ease the burdens pediatric cancer places on families while creating comfort, connection, and joy during treatment.

What it reported doing in 2025

One mission is a pediatric cancer charity dedicated to improving the lives of children and families from diagnosis, through treatment, and beyond. Through 30 programs and services, one mission helps reduce the emotional, physical, and financial burdens pediatric cancer places on families while creating moments of comfort, connection, and joy during treatment.programs are primarily delivered at boston children's hospital, dana-farber cancer institute, and hasbro children's hospital. Services include creative therapies, caregiver meals, family support programming, milestone celebrations, financial assistance, stress management programs, and patient resource support.in 2025, one mission supported more than 4,000 pediatric cancer patients and family members. Since 2008, the organization has raised more than $20 million and provided comfort, support, and critical resources to more than 60,000 patients and families.at boston children's hospital, one mission provides comprehensive support through the one mission resource room, which serves as a central hub for patients and families to access programming, resources, and community support. Programs include art therapy, music therapy, caregiver meals, family dinners, educational resources, sibling support, necessity items, special occasion celebrations, and dedicated program staff who help create a safe, welcoming, and supportive environment for families navigating pediatric cancer.one mission also helps ease the financial burden pediatric cancer places on families through its parking pass assistance program at boston children's hospital, which has provided more than 156,000 parking passes to families in need to date.at dana-farber cancer institute, one mission supports the pediatric resource program, which provides financial assistance for groceries, rent, mortgage payments, household bills, and transportation for low-income families facing the financial burden of pediatric cancer.at hasbro children's hospital, one mission funds creative arts and healing programs, yoga for kids, patient and sibling outings, family meals, end of chemo celebrations, and other therapeutic and recreational activities designed to reduce stress, promote emotional well-being, and create moments of joy during treatment.one mission also partners with like-minded organizations, including camp casco and rett's roost, to provide camp experiences, healing retreats, and bereavement support for families impacted by pediatric cancer.throughout every stage of the pediatric cancer journey, one mission remains committed to providing well-rounded support that cares for the entire family - helping patients, siblings, parents, and caregivers feel supported, connected, and never alone.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 67% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 70
  • Transparency & Controls: 83
  • Accountability: 66
  • Sustainability: 47
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 72.8%; rating input score 73
  • Program expense ratio: 77.8%; rating input score 78
  • Fundraising efficiency: $9.09 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 60%; rating input score 60; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.28; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 13.7%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14.1% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 72.8% of revenue deployed · 77.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 5 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $866K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $153K · 6 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 30 of 31 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 7 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 32/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 27/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.