One Mind

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
680359707
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Rutherford, CA, USA
Phone
7079634038
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$10,073,819
Expenses
$8,279,516
Assets
$8,829,182
Liabilities
$2,231,759

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

28 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRANDON STAGLIN (PRESIDENT, CHIEF ADVOCACY & ENGAGEMENT OFFICER)
  • KATHLEEN PIKE (CEO, ONE MIND AT WORK)
  • CHRISTINA MCCARTHY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, ONE MIND AT WORK)

Highest reported compensation

  • PUSHKAR JOSHI (CHIEF STRATEGY & SCIENCE OFFICER): $518,824 total reported compensation
  • KATHLEEN PIKE (CEO, ONE MIND AT WORK): $436,095 total reported compensation
  • TAL GERZON (CHIEF DEVELOPMENT OFFICER): $401,565 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

One mind harnesses the power of science and lived experience to improve mental health outcomes for individuals, families, and society.

What it reported doing in 2024

One mind all media develops, partners, produces and disseminates content that shapes culture, educates audiences, and reduces stigma and discrimination. From broadcast and streaming to print and performance, every platform can be a force for change.lived experience and the one mind community advisory network (omcan) is a diverse, volunteer-driven group of dedicated mental health advocates carefully selected to expand and enrich the work of the one mind lived experience council. Omcan members are playing a pivotal role in influencing one mind's strategic planning and in the development of the one mind launchpad program, helping shape strategies to assist individuals living with serious mental illness to grow meaningful careers in supportive work environments.the science & innovation symposiums feature leading researchers and entrepreneurs presenting groundbreaking advances in brain health, workplace wellness, and innovative therapies, fostering collaboration and accelerating solutions for mental health.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 85% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 89
  • Accountability: 89
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 66.6%; rating input score 67
  • Program expense ratio: 81%; rating input score 81
  • Fundraising efficiency: $12.34 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.5%; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 17.8%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.07; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.25; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 39.7%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 66.6% of revenue deployed · 81% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 16 of 18 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $6.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $519K · 28 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $400K reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 14 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 44/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 52/100.