One Master Ministries

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
272171056
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Xenia, OH, USA
Phone
9374776861
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Financial Counseling
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$134,785
Expenses
$138,054
Assets
$22,536
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • William Carey Northington (President)

People named in this filing

  • William Carey Northington (President)
  • Kurt Braun (Treasurer)
  • Chris Sultan (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

One Master Ministries (the 'Corporation') is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable and educational purposes within the meaning of Section 501 (c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, including, without limitation thereto, the following: A. Educating Christians and others on the biblical definition and cultural significance of stewardship to help individuals live out God's calling of serving the One Master. B. Providing churches with true biblical stewardship resources and help to encourage individuals and families to serve the One Master.

What it reported doing in 2025

One-on-one financial coaching to help individuals and families develop budgets, improve financial stewardship, and work toward financial stability. Coaching is provided at reduced rates or no charge when individuals are unable to afford the regular fee.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 74% for direct work, and 26% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 48
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 48%; rating input score 48
  • Program expense ratio: 46.8%; rating input score 47

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2.4%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.16; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 65.2%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 28.3% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 48% of revenue deployed · 46.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $65K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 48/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 47/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.