One Hit Away Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
465136108
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-N 2014
Location
Millbrae, CA, USA
Phone
6509540933
Rating
45
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Health Program (Includes General Health and Wellness Promotion Services)

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$139,355
Expenses
$124,446
Assets
$118,975
Liabilities
$8,873

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRETT V CDE BACA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • DARREN A CDE BACA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • JILL M CDE BACA (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • BRETT V CDE BACA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • DARREN A CDE BACA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • JILL M CDE BACA (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Fiscal year ending june 2021 was our seventh fiscal year of operation. Over the same time frame, one hit away foundation provided education, support and resources for brain healing and brain health from sports-related brain sub-concussions and concussions.

What it reported doing in 2020

Onehitaway has assisted over 200 individual recipients seeking to incorporate the in-formation and healing modalities our foundation advocates. Over $61,000 was given to for the services of these recipients.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.7%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.96; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -75% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2014 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 47/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.